Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wajyutsu Keisyukai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 15:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Wajyutsu Keisyukai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Gym with no significant independent coverage so fails WP:GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 20:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * 'Comment This is a network rather than a single gym and several individual clubs within the network have their own articles.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:16, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You're right about it being a network. However, the fact that some of the gyms have articles falls under WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.  In addition, based on the links in this article the other gym's "articles" are just redirects to their respective founders. Papaursa (talk) 02:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The article has no significant independent coverage of this network of gyms--just passing mentions, its web page, and a blog. Papaursa (talk) 02:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:33, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak delete The number of notable fighters is impressive. I partly wonder that my WP:BEFORE results are failing because of the romanization of the Japanese name. If we knew the actual Japanese name it may show more results. That being said, the official website does not appear to work, or access is forbidden because it's a dubious link which prevents any further research. As such I cannot provide any WP:SIGCOV and the WP:BURDEN cannot be relieved. Mkdw talk 06:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.