Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wake Up! Aria (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The one review isn't enough to show notability. Fences &amp;  Windows  21:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Wake Up! Aria
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

None notable pornographic anime OVA. Has only received one "micro review" from a reliable source, which isn't enough to pass WP:NOTE. —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:45, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It gets reviewed . The quality level of the audio and video and packaging are there, that including it, then it gets mentioned on its own for a bit.  There isn't much to say in a review about this, but that doesn't make the review less valid.   D r e a m Focus  08:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The "Micro-review" is hardly the "significant coverage" required to pass WP:N and the stuff about the packaging is not be counted towards coverage of the work itself. —Farix (t &#124; c) 12:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I can see a needs more references tag dated September 2006 at the top of the article. If this was really as notable as people may claim it to be then there would be more out there to work with. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not sure what that means. I get over 400,000 Google hits.  There seems to be plenty out there to work with, even if most of those hits do not meet WP:RS.  Rlendog (talk) 17:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree. The Wikipedia policy is to use WP:Common Sense, and decide for yourself.  If even 400,000 people know what it is, then its notable.  And of course, far more than just those talking about it on a forum, or hosting it somewhere, have heard of it.  The suggested guidelines can be ignored, they holding no weight whatsoever, just suggestions to help people make a decision.  You decide on your own whether the article should be kept or not, whether it helps the encyclopedia to keep things like this in it WP:IAR, and then state your opinion here.  Never hesitate to say what is on your mind, everyone entitled to their own opinions.   D r e a m Focus  17:43, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete In my Google search I only turn up 33 hits, and none of those seem to be a reliable source. ArcAngel (talk) 07:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.