Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wake Up! WA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 03:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Wake Up! WA

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete Spam/advert article for a non-notable small time television show. &mdash; Gaff ταλκ 06:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Article fine - deleted autobiographical elements - what else needs deleting? - article made due a group's request to view every week. can this article still exist if shorten and no pictures and minor details, i understand if article not relevent - Dgio 18:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Huge Rewrite Needed or Delete - It reads like an advert. It should included information only. (There is no mention of what TV/Radio Channel it is on. -- Rehnn83 Talk 15:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment it's a pretty poor advert if it doesn't tell you where to get the product!Garrie 21:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per nom. Fails criteria of WP:NOTE and WP:SPAM.--Edtropolis 15:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy D - As spam - Tiswas (t) 16:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NOTE and sounds promotional rather than encyclopedic. Not quite clear-cut enough for me to feel comfortable speedy-deleting it, though. MastCell Talk 21:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * if page is not suitable for wikipedia, then take a look at other channel 31 shows that have pages. are those other shows notable or worthy enough for a page? Dgio 13:51, 14th June 2007
 * Channel 31 Perth, or channel 31 generally (which is used in every Australian city as a community channel frequency)? Some eastern states community TV shows are far more notable than ours. Generally they (Perth ones) should all be headings on the Access 31 article unless they are standouts. Orderinchaos 16:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  -- Mattinbgn/talk 11:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Rewrite. I think it is sufficiently notable given the 2006 Best New Producer community TV award (although maybe that really justifies an article for that un-named producer?) plus it's life of 300+ episodes on community TV. BUT it needs references otherwise delete it.Garrie 21:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Rewrite and keep this mess, please! :-)  Yes, it appears notable, but expert work is needed on this one. Bearian 01:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete given that I can find no sources for this on Google News or Google News Archive. Capitalistroadster 07:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep & fix: Methinks us Brits and Yanks sometimes forget there are other people speaking English that have TV Shows that are household names as far as they are concerned.--Mike18xx 08:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment This isn't even a household name in their home market of Perth (my home city, where it broadcasts). The national programs Today and Sunrise carry the early morning demographic. Orderinchaos 16:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable show on a community station with a tiny demographic in its home market (it's not quite the same as Melbourne's equivalent), and very unlikely to have WP:RS. Alternatively, I have no objection to it being rewritten per Garrie and ors. Orderinchaos 16:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or redirect to Access 31 with history intact. Minor  News Archive and .gov.au hits make me lean towards keep.  For international Afd participants, note that Australia only has one community TV station in each region. John Vandenberg 11:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.