Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walajabad taluk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Closing as Speedy Keep as LISTCRUFT doesn't even apply here!, I question whether the nom even knows what "Listcruft" even is!, Obvious Keep is obvious (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 13:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Walajabad taluk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:Listcruft  CatcherStorm    talk   09:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, by no means WP:Listcruft (i.e. "a term some editors use to refer to indiscriminate or trivial lists."). A taluk should be notable per WP:NGEO. Covers 80 villages, http://www.kanchi.tn.nic.in/wal_taluk.html . --Soman (talk) 11:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep – Listcruft is not a valid rationale for deletion, and the topic passes WP:GEOLAND as a populated, legally-recognized place by the Government of India: . Furthermore, a list of villages is certainly not "listcruft". See WP:FIVEPILLARS, where it is explained how the encyclopedia functions in part as an almanac. North America1000 11:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - this article isn't inherently just a list; it's fundamentally about a taluk (an administrative division) and hence inherently notable per WP:GEOLAND as a legally-reconized place. Granted it could use some expansion to add some extra info about the taluk itself, but I don't see that as a reason to delete. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 12:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.