Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walden Drive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:18, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Walden Drive

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable permastub. No sources; brief check turned up only trivial mentions, some of which were to a street in Colorado and not in California. Declined PROD. Most of the content violates WP:NOT p  b  p  14:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Never going to be notable enough and even if it was, the whole thing is written in such a promotional way deletion is the only way I can !vote.  Rcsprinter   (talkin' to me?)  @ 15:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. The house may be notable but this does not automatically confer notability on the street on which it is located. Fails WP:GNG. -- Kinu  t/c 16:48, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete—An article about a street, on which a famous house (which has its own article) is built. Notability is not inherited, and 99% of the article is about the house anyway.  Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 17:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as the subject is non notable --It's Atreem (From the planet Venus) 21:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Only a bunch of real estate/property directories exist for this (to which some lead to other similarly-named streets in Eagan, MN, Eureka, MO, Glencoe, IL and Knoxville, TN among others) ; none of which are satisfactory enough to pass WP:V. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 08:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Though the house at 516 Walden Drive is indisputably notable, I have been unable to find any discussion of the street itself as a topic in reliable sources. Just lots of passing mentions. Another editor asked me to look at this AfD, but did not lobby me either way.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  04:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.