Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walid Mushtaq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Walid Mushtaq

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional bio created by a SPA.. no in depth coverage on the subject. Saqib (talk) 06:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:37, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment It looks like this was originally an AfC page, but after a decline the author just moved it on his own to mainspace. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * No, it was later accepted by the person who declined it initially. Though what you said do happen. &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 01:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly promotional. Fails WP:GNG. Störm   (talk)  15:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep this is not unlike others in the category of Pakistani educational theorists. I sort of understand the promotional argument but it is like if you don't say something bad about a person then it is wrong and I don't think that is what this is all about.--BelBivDov (talk) 02:01, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- does not meet WP:ANYBIO and significant RS coverage not found. Clearly promotional as well, such content is specifically excluded per WP:NOTSPAM. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:45, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet the notability guidelines for educationalists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:01, 25 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.