Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walk-in


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Yellow Dingo&#160;(talk) 00:16, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Walk-in

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence that this is anything but WP:OR No evidence of any notability and no references are provided. Searches yield nothing of value. Fails WP:GNG. Previous PROD removed by IP editor without any given reason  Velella  Velella Talk 09:55, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 10:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as a WP:FRINGE concept which gained a lot of traction from Ruth Montgomery's 1979 book Strangers Among Us. Somewhat harder to find citations since the phrase to "walk in" is widely used in the normal sense, but making it plural might help in finding sources, also adding the phrase ruth montgomery to the search is helpful. Also, the nominator's statement "Previous PROD removed by IP editor without any given reason" is false; the IP said "but some other references do include the term, and it needs explanation on wikipedia, i came here looking for it. if you can improve the article go ahead, but don't delete it". Anyway, I've just added six scholarly citations from notable new-religion scholars. Softlavender (talk) 14:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Nice one! Keep per new refs - David Gerard (talk) 00:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep -- per new sources and referenced added to the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:41, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.