Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walker Lamond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:13, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Walker Lamond

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This subject does not warrant an article in Wikipedia. The sources are his own website (!) and IMDb, which oftentimes lists just about anyone/thing, and where much of the information is suspect or patently false. Note that the subject himself has edited his own page much of the time and the "article" (read: mini-paragraph) portrays him as a legend in the business, which is just absurd. How being an assistant, I mean "protege" (likely his own words), to an established filmmaker means he deserves an article in an encyclopedia is beyond me and the vast majority of others - this is merely blatant self-promotion, a detriment to our culture. Houndsteeth (talk) 17:44, 16 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete. I cannot find any worthwhile mention of this person either. But on a related note, nominator has only one act to his credit on WP: the AfD for Walker Lamond. Drmies (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete In not considering the WP:SPA nominator's motivation, and ignoring his error in slamming IMDB's accuracy for simple non-contentious facts, all I can myself only find bits and pieces about the subject: Vimeo, LinkedIn, Babble, TV.Com, New York Times, PHFilms, Spoke, Spout, Mama's Got Moxie, Film.com, etc. All prove his existance, but none show any specoial notability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per lolz, if it's kept; recommend taking the case to WP:COI and WP:BLP. Ryan 4314   (talk) 04:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Mizu   onna   sango15  Hello!  23:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.