Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walker Morris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 08:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Walker Morris

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable local law firm. Doesn't meet WP:CORP; article has no claim to notability, no second-source references, and no referenced claims to notability. The topic is just a press release, really; a form of advertising. Mikeblas (talk) 14:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep 750 employees is a large/notable law firm, with a rewrite could be a good article... RP459 (talk) 14:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Size!=notability if there aren't proper sources to show that they've done anything notable. A press release is not a proper source. DarkAudit (talk) 15:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. "Articles" that read like advertisements or press releases are spam.  If the firm is in fact notable, a spam article only misleads readers into thinking that the subject has in fact been covered.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per Smerdis. ukexpat (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam unless someone is prepared to rewrite it using reliable sources to show its notability. . . Rcawsey (talk) 09:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.