Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walkill Valley Regional High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep per general consensus that high school articles are to be kept. howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 18:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Walkill Valley Regional High School
Not a notable school Paul Carpenter 18:53, 19 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep We have fought this battle many times, most recently regarding Articles for deletion/Garfield High School (New Jersey). While that article was (and unfortunatley still is) in need of much additional work, and that article consisted of a few fragmentary sentences, "The result of the debate was keep per general consensus that high schools are notable." Given the far more extensive content of the current article in question and the fact that it clearly meets the qualifications laid out at WP:SCH, this article should be kept. Furthermore, as this is a regional school serving four separate municipalities, it would make no logical sense to insert the content into all four of the constituent pages, as might be the case if it were a high school in a single community. I appreciate the concern in addressing trivial pages in Wikipedia, but we need to put this issue to bed once and for all. Alansohn 19:06, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per clear past precedent on high schools. The article is as good as any we have on that subject. Sjakkalle (Check!)  16:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep all valid High Schools. Bad faith nom. IMO. &mdash; RJH 17:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.