Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walking Papers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nakon 03:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Walking Papers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hardly passes the WP:MUSIC notability test. To the point the disambiguation page that probably deserves this namespace (the one with all lowercase is a redirect) doesn't list this album! igordebraga ≠ 14:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  15:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  15:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * No claim made in the article passes WP:NMUSIC at all — in fact, the writing tone is teetering right on the edge of being deletable as a WP:NOTADVERT violation — and the article's only "reference" in a single deadlinked source which was never an especially reliable one in the first place. So nothing here adequately demonstrates that the album qualifies for its own article. Delete and repurpose as dab page per nom (although the album should be added to it, with the band itself as the line's bluelink.) Bearcat (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 19:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.