Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walknut


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin | wasn't he just...? 17:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Walknut

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:MUSIC. One release. No evidence of significant coverage. Michig (talk) 14:54, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 15:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Even Encyclopaedia Metallum's entry on them is sparse and lists no label. And, of course, their homepage just happens to be on MySpace.... -- jonny - m  t  16:20, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep They already appear in an encyclopedia on heavy metal music as mentioned above. As Wikipedia does not differentiate between general and specialist topics and this article can be sourced there does not appear to be a reason to delete it. Catchpole (talk) 20:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Hardly significant coverage or a reliable source, which is what's required for notability.--Michig (talk) 21:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Notability isn't a core concern. Catchpole (talk) 22:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * What? Notability and verifiability are the two main things an article needs.--Michig (talk) 12:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 00:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.