Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WallStreet Tower Omaha (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

WallStreet Tower Omaha
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I nominated this back in 2007 as non-notable, I received resistance and the article was kept despite the fact that the structure had never even broken ground. I was reviewing some of my old nominations and came across this, lo and behold, they never broke ground! This was obviously WP:TOOSOON I don't see how a structure that almost got built is notable enough to warrant an article. -War wizard90 (talk) 04:51, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 04:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 04:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as nonexistent structure and aside perhaps how it may have added to the Omaha skyline not notable anyway.--MONGO 07:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – Some buildings are notable even if they never get built, but this article was always about a development project. There was very little about the building except as a property. The links are all dead, the links from the previous AfD are dead, and the two links I could find from the TV station (main source of previous AfD) were this and this, which are about the abandoned site as real estate. – Margin1522 (talk) 08:14, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as a case of WP:TOOSOON. Like Margin1522 said, most of the links are dead, but from I can tell most of this looks like WP:ROUTINE news coverage. Tavix | Talk
 * Delete Really couldn't find any notable information about this building Sec12345 (talk) 17:28, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.