Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wallace Adams-Riley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 18:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Wallace Adams-Riley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable clergyman of a church. Have not found any RS on him specifically. Natg 19 (talk) 17:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 17:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Doesn't seem to be all that notable. Seems to be a little bit of a case of WP:BIOFAMILY. bojo  &#124;  talk  17:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Vicar of a notable church, which always makes notability highly probably.  Click on HighBeam and Books in the search bar for a start on available sourcing.  and here: is a gNews search.  What we have here is an article started in 2013 by an SPA who either admires or knows this family or perhaps is a fan of The Last Confederate: The Story of Robert Adams.  It is a poor-quality article about a notable clergyman; keep and hope for an editor who will expand, source.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * DElete -- Even if the church is notable, its clergy do not inherit notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.