Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waller Drive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Fram (talk) 15:29, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Waller Drive

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested speedy by User:Boing! said Zebedee, while it strictly does not fit with any of the CSD criteria, it is obviously too short and unencyclopaedic.

Not notable either, our good friend Google only lists some real estate ads. Paolo Napolitano  18:31, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy delete as nom. Paolo Napolitano  18:32, 19 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can find no sign of notability - but it doesn't fit any CSD criteria (and there is no such thing as "obviously too short") -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:39, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's just a street, and an unremarkable one at that. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per everything said thus far. Bzweebl (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Just an ordinary non-notable street. SL93 (talk) 22:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Please also delete the redirect Waller drive if the result is delete.-- Lakokat ( Drop me a line ) 07:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete -- This appears to be a modest NN housing estate. A considerable part of the text appears to fail WP:OR.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.