Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wallimann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Withdrawn, nom's concerns were adressed; this is now a perfectly valid dab page. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Wallimann

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

None of the listed individuals in this purported disambig page has a WP article so is it a valid disambig? ukexpat (talk) 15:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The nomination was completely valid, but I replaced the purported dab page with a real dab page, with three bluelinks. Now it deserves keeping, I think. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. - after the excellent work done by David Eppstein. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 17:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - we have articles like this. —TreasuryTag talk contribs  17:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.