Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wally and Osborne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 18:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Wally and Osborne

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet WP:WEB standards for notability.


 * The content itself has not been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.
 * The website or content has not won a notable independent award from either a publication or organisation.
 * The content is not distributed via a medium which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster.

- Francis Tyers · 18:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin - the series is serialized on Funbrain.com, an insanely popular website, and the comic is also known as "On the Rocks" - Perhaps more popularly known at that title. Therefore, the comic meets WP:WEB and the nomination was flawed. WhisperToMe 05:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per my own nomination. - Francis Tyers · 18:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Francis. bogdan 18:55, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per those guys Aaronbrick 18:55, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as the site does not meet WP:WEB standards. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment "The content is not distributed via a medium which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster." - What about Funbrain? Funbrain, rank 4,200, serializes this series. EDIT: Wikipedia article is at FunBrain.com - By the way, the comic is printed here: http://www.funbrain.com/comics/comic_ontherocks.html WhisperToMe 21:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Number 2 - Did you check to see how the title "On the Rocks" fared? I googled and I have these results: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22On+the+Rocks%22+webcomic+-wikipedia&btnG=Search - See, the title changed, so you may not get many hits with the new title. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22On+the+Rocks%22+%22Tyler+Martin%22+-wikipedia&btnG=Search gets 33,000 WhisperToMe 22:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletions.   -- SkierRMH 02:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. What's with this spree of cut-and-paste furry webcomic deletions and content-free "delete" votes? The irony is that this "keep" vote is itself content-free, I'm mainly just getting frustrated at the apparent lack of due diligence that is being exercised here. Bryan Derksen 08:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - The series, in fact, meets WP:WEB due to the serialization at Funbrain.com AND the actual popularity (through the old On The Rocks title) WhisperToMe 14:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Second Bryan Derksen who is in accordance with my own mantra: Wikipedia editors are overzealous at deleting webcomic entries. Lee M 03:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N, lacks multiple, non-trivial, reliable published works, whose sources are independent of the subject itself. WP:NOT an internet guide. -- Dragonfiend 08:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced... Addhoc 13:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sourced. See External Links. TylerMartin 16:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.