Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Bread


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete as blatant advertising. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Walter Bread

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Spam. Speedy delete and prod tags have been removed, time for AFD. Even in earlier forms there seemed to never be a claim to notability, and recent edits have only turned this into a blatant advertisement. Text and photos appear to be lifted from several sites. JNW (talk) 03:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong delete, also retag w/ db-spam b/c it applies in this case. Probable Speedy delete.  Thin  boy  00  @195, i.e. 03:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Definitely Speedy Delete. This is so obviously spam!  Get  Dumb   04:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Obvious spam is obvious. Also completely non-notable. Skinny87 (talk) 07:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Spam on toast anyone? Quantpole (talk) 11:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I also listed the logos at Possibly unfree files (here and here). Hmm, this is making me hungry... Jafeluv (talk) 12:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Correction: the files are actually from Commons. Never mind. Jafeluv (talk) 13:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Waterbed as punishment. "Who would have ever thought that something sweet can also be something healthy... with each bite you get to enjoy the rich taste of wheat and raisin...."  Wikipedia doesn't take paid advertising, and advertising for free is even more obnoxious. Mandsford (talk) 17:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Stop it, you're making me hungry again :o Jafeluv (talk) 20:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment As long as we're thinking in that direction, I recommend a redirect here ... JNW (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and salt to prevent recreation, as we evidently have a spammy editor on our hands who feels himself above our guidelines. Ray  Talk 18:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. The editor responsible for the article calls himself User:Creativebakers and, coincidentally, Walter Bread is a product of "Creative Bakers, Co. Inc." The images in the article are in commons and licensed by User:Creativebakers as his own work. How much more "unambiguous advertisement or promotion" can you get? Jafeluv (talk) 20:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I've posted a message at . It's the spammiest page I've seen...remarkable that it's still up. JNW (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.