Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Cavanagh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 20:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Walter Cavanagh
I'm not sure where I stand on this article, so I'm bringing it here to generate some discussion. On one hand, he holds a Guinness World Record, but on the other hand it's one of the many, many Guinness records that aren't "normal". This isn't the world's tallest man or oldest living person, it's a person who collects a lot of credit cards. There's verifiability there, but is this a notable accomplishment? Metros232 01:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inherently not notable per WP:BIO per nom. The trivia facts section seals the deal. Alphachimp   talk  01:52, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --Ezeu 01:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 02:24, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Humerous, but non-notable -- Librarianofages 02:27, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. OK it might be pointless record, but nevertheless, he does hold a world record so is notable. Markb 09:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOT a mirror of Guinness World Records. Just zis Guy you know? 11:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above AdamBiswanger1 13:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; WP:BIO. Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --PresN 18:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Funny, but not notable. The 'stub tag' is amusing. Grand  master  ka  06:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep It can easily be a perfect stub. Needs a tiny bit of cleanup.Patcat88 04:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.