Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Mech


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Walter Mech

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unofficial name for star, not recognised by any scientific authority. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 20:25, 1 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, non-notable person, not a recognized name for the star, and looks a bit like spam for the webpage. Hairhorn (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable with no sources. Derild  49  21  ☼  01:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as there is absolutely no indication of notability. Additionaly Wikipedia is not the news or a guide to find stars. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  11:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - vanity star naming - not notable -- Whpq (talk) 15:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no notability demonstrated in any source, and no sources to support the claims. N2e (talk) 19:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.