Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter R. Nord


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:44, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Walter R. Nord

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sorry, fails all criteria of WP:PROF MJH (talk) 03:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking in depth coverage in reliable independent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:07, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  talk to me! 09:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. — Ed! (talk) 14:23, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Google scholar gives him an h-index above 25 (good possibility of satisfying WP:PROF). The very first source on the article is an interview for the professor following his receipt of a an award for being a distinguished educator. He was an editor on the Handbook of Organization Studies, a frequently used text in courses on the subject (see, for example, ). These two point towards satisfying WP:Prof). His bio  lists him as a Distinguished University Professor at the University of South Florida, possibly satisfying WP:PROF).  Ray  Talk 17:35, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems to satisfy two categories of WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:30, 18 December 2012 (UTC).
 * Keep -- the Distinguished University Professor at USF is awarded a bit more liberally than at most comparable schools, but it's probably still enough for PROF-C5, and definitely above the Average Professor Test -- Ray's research is quite convincing on C1 and C4 as well. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 05:44, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.