Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Sickert and The Army of Broken Toys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:39, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Walter Sickert and The Army of Broken Toys

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * CommentI feel you need to give them more time to edit - I have found several of the sources inclousing ther NPR coverage and golbe and phoenix - ifr I was a better user I woulod actually add them, but WIkipedia confuses me in how to edit so I only use it for research and almost never update - give them a chance

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.88.222.237 (talk) 17:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC). A band. Looks like self-promotion with a ridiculous link to Walter Sickert. Are they notable? -- RHaworth 16:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * CommentOk added the NPR thing but as a new user I am not sure I did it correctly - I have lost of other info to add, but let me practice a bit on other pages - please leave this here please!!!! THese guys are really important and introducing an important genre of music - differnt form so many. If you look at history the link to Walter Sickert (the leader of the band is named after him and is an artist in his own right - will find MoMa link with his art)

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.116.222.46 (talk) 17:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete No current evidence that this band passes WP:BAND. --Dweller 16:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article makes several claims which satisfy WP:BAND: receiving airplay on NPR, and featured in several newspapers and magazines including a cover story in one. The only problem is that none of these claims are sourced. Krimpet (talk) 17:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * delete - i wish we could speedy based on the influences section alone. there are no reliable sources to back up their claims. the_undertow talk  00:41, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable fails WP:MUSIC, unsourced, no info allmusic.com.--Dakota 03:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced material. Sr13 (T|C) ER 06:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. not notable per WP:MUSICSlideAndSlip 11:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:MUSIC.-- danntm T C 19:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: added background to several of the claims - I haven't done it neatly - I hope tha twon't be penalized - I vote for community support —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.116.222.46 (talk) 19:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Keep there is a fair bit of info on this, we just need someone to write it up. ~ G1ggy!  ...chatterbox... 23:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I thought it was useful information, good solid well known music that needed an entry. ~ User:doctormo 05:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * comment - part of the article appears to have been copied directly from http://thephoenix.com/bandguide/artistprofile2.aspx?id=3042 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Whpq (talk • contribs) 16:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC).
 * comment* as good a place to start as any - how does one link pics here I've found a few good ones from some of the articles —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.180.130.80 (talk) 21:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete Per the_undertow  &mdash;A • D  Torque 11:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.