Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wan Kuzain Wan Kamal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Wan Kuzain Wan Kamal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:NPOV both in its writing and its sources. The first source is a forum posting that could have been made by anyone. The second is a blog that reads like it was written by a close family member or friend.

I cannot find significant media coverage or any third party information on Wan Kuzain Wan Kamal that would merit his inclusion in Wikipedia. HarlandQPitt (talk) 17:59, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. He is an 11 or 12 year-old child who may or may not make it in the future. Right now all we have is a clear failure to meet WP:ATHLETE and only blogs and Youtube as references. In Wikipedia terms he is non-notable. I tagged the article for speedy deletion; I don't think replacing that with this AfD nomination was necessary. I42 (talk) 18:06, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't fulfill WP:ATHLETE. Fenix down (talk) 19:44, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  cab (talk) 03:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  cab (talk) 03:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a speedy deletion candidate but plainly not notable either against the community's standard of WP:ATH. --Mkativerata (talk) 03:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - He clearly fails WP:ATHLETE, which is not suprising for someone his age. The lack of significant coverage means he also fails WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 21:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete this isn't myspace.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.