Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wan Qingliang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Wan Qingliang

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

relatively unknown politician. not worthy of having an article. Does not meet notability guidelines. Helmulton (talk) 04:46, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - The mayor of a major metro with 10,000,000 residents is almost never 'relatively unknown'. The key in dealing with articles from developing nations is to run a search in the native language, which would be something like "万庆良" "广州" in this case. As many times as I've seen nominations like this recently, I'm seriously thinking about starting an essay on the topic. —  C M B J   07:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep: This article passes WP:GNG, with sources including Reuters India, The Standard, Fox News, newsgd, and CCTV. Wan also passes WP:POLITICIANS as the vice governor of a major province, and the mayor of the third largest city in china. This is not a problematic article by any means. He meets notability guidelines, and is not "unknown". NLinpublic (talk) 14:11, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment to admins: The user who put this up for deletion has no edits besides this. Just a heads-up. NLinpublic (talk) 14:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per the above. Mayor of one of the world's largest cities. Location (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per above. Some weird stuff getting nominated for deletion today!  68.45.109.14 (talk) 22:23, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.