Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wan Wan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. alphachimp. 18:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Wan Wan

 * — (View AfD)

"Wan Wan" is not the widely used term for this sound, and the creator acknowledges on her talk page that she has no verifiable sources that anyone uses this term but her and her friends. FisherQueen 23:14, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - as a protologism - Peripitus (Talk) 00:01, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete oviously. No sources, nothing. Guy (Help!) 00:56, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverifiable, unsourced, poor if any encyclopedic potential. --MCB 01:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, OR, unverifiable, etc. Shimeru 03:06, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverifiable original research. —ShadowHalo 05:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Add Many Sources or Delete - Article needs many verifiable authoritative sources cited to back up it's statements, or it should be deleted. Lentower 04:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, "Wan Wan" term is clearly OR, so are the many claims this article makes. (If this sound really is that notable and recognizable, it must have a name or nickname within the entertainment industry. So if someone really wants this article kept, they should try and find what the effect's real name is.) Quack 688 07:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.