Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wand of Watoomb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Features of the Marvel Universe. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:45, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Wand of Watoomb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This does not establish notability independent of Marvel Comics through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 15:46, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into Features of the Marvel Universe. BOZ (talk) 16:10, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge (or redirect) to Features of the Marvel Universe, in which this item is listed.  Gong   show  18:47, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Covered in detail in sources such as the The Encyclopedia of Super Villains. Warden (talk) 17:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Unless it is significant coverage as required per WP:N, it is not a source that can be of any value to this article. TTN (talk) 21:43, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The source satisfies WP:SIGCOV so we're good. Warden (talk) 22:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." Unless you show that it has a significant section rather than a passing mention in a plot summary, it fails to meet that guideline. That doesn't even include the fact that it isn't going to contain real world information, meaning that it will be useless to the article anyway. TTN (talk) 22:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The source and article are fine. You're the one making a proposition here and as, so far, it seems to totally lack consensus, you're the one with work to do. Warden (talk) 22:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Whatever. The source that you have presented has no proof of actually being able to cover anything significant or relevant to the article. I doubt "The Wand of Watoomb was mentioned as a part of a plot description of [character] in The Encyclopedia of Super Villains" is going to be able to establish anything. As usual, you just ignore NOTPLOT, WAF, and N without even addressing them, so there is no point in arguing with you. TTN (talk) 22:27, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge as a purely in-universe plot article with no substantial non-plot coverage to form an article from.--Yaksar (let's chat) 21:35, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.