Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wanessa Milhomem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, good argumentation--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Wanessa Milhomem

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I had this as a blp prod then I noticed the refs are here but put oddly. I'm not sure if she reaches guidelines for wiki or not. Wgolf (talk) 00:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. After going through the references listed in the article, then most of the potential sources I could find on the internet, I couldn't find any significant coverage. Fails GNG. APerson (talk!) 04:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Wanessa is a recognized model all over the world! Have been worked with the most important fashion clients. Is represented by most important agencies such as Marilyn NY, Elite London , Metropolitan Paris , Wilhelmina Miami and should have a profile talking about her! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leozitchus (talk • contribs) 00:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

She is a great model and she has lots of references she is been in the spot light and very recognised in fashion. She has more things online then a lot other fashion models who are on Wikipedia. She should be in it.
 * Note: Struck sockpuppet comment, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America1000 00:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon  01:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:BLPNOTE for lack of significant coverage. Mere directory listings such as the cited NY Magazine, and tabloid stuff about being Anthony Kiedis's main squeeze are not that kind of coverage. Notability is not inherited. Neither is passing mention in articles about fashions shows, anything more than "passing mention". --Bejnar (talk) 07:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.