Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Hao-yu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 10:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Wang Hao-yu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A slightly unusual one. The en.wiki article is a stub about a city councillor who I think would probably not pass WP:NPOL. However the zh.wiki article is massively refbombed with 106 sources. I am not sure about the reliability of some of them but in amongst all of this there may be a GNG pass. Hopefully someone familiar with the Taiwanese sources can shed some light. Mccapra (talk) 08:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added several sources. This politician has received significant coverage in reliable sources and meets the general notability guideline. --Neo-Jay (talk) 11:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article needs to be expanded, but there are many sources on the Internet to make the article pass WP:GNG since Wang Hao-yu is the first ever city councilor in special municipality to be recalled in the history of Republic of China . Pan-green supporters also believed that the recalls (including Wang's) are "revenge recalls" of the recall vote of Han Kuo-yu last year . Sun8908 &#8239;Talk 16:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Additional comment: The article creator also commented on the article talk page after the article was tagged notability. It's worth taking a look. Sun8908 &#8239;Talk 17:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per my comments at Talk:Wang Hao-yu. Agree the article should be expanded, but those interested in recall law/thresholds will be interested in this individual.  He is generally brought up as an example of a very borderline case where recall should probably have failed. DrIdiot (talk) 17:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per above! VocalIndia (talk) 06:12, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.