Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Jun (businessman)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Wang Jun (businessman)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The company might be notable (but see below), but there doesn't seem to be enough to make this person himself notable. Moderate delete. --Nlu (talk) 15:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the related company article for deletion for the sake of considering them consistently, but I am taking no position on the company:




 * Keep both. According to the current references in Wang Jun, he has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and therefore he is notable. --Neo-Jay (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep company article, company seems to be a significant defense contractor for the PRC. No position regarding businessman article. --Voidvector (talk) 16:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, called a "key player" in the White House coffees scandal by the WaPo, more recent coverage calls him a ChiCom "princeling" whose interest in a nearly-defunct HK company made its stock soar. --Dhartung | Talk 21:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Everybody Wang Jun tonight! Keep per above. Mandsford (talk) 02:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.