Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Lang Market


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Sources presented demonstrated GNG (non-admin closure) Aszx5000 (talk) 17:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Wang Lang Market

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't seem to meet the notability guidelines - sources are unreliable due to being largely self-published and user-generated as far as I can tell. Suntooooth (talk) 02:34, 9 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep One of the few remaining street food markets in Bangkok, widely mentioned and has received some substantive coverage. I've added some cites; this isn't an issue of notability but of a need for sourcing for the article. Oblivy (talk) 03:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Could you please link to a few sources that you think best meet WP:SIGCOV? JML1148 (talk &#124; contribs) 09:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I only had a short amount of time to work on this, but the Sethlui.com cite is quite substantive. The Bangkok Post article  supports the material about naming, and mentions the market.  There are some Google Scholar hits as well like this (paper here) which are entirely about the market. Oblivy (talk) 11:24, 9 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. Oblivy has added a citation to Sethlui.com (a noted Singaporean food website), and in-depth coverage exists by plenty of established food and travel guides, including Travelfish and Time Out, not to mention Thai-language sources. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Suntooooth, since this appears to be your first time nominating an article at AfD, I'd like to suggest taking a close look at the guidance at WP:BEFORE, if you haven't already done so. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep and add information backed up by reliable sources with WP:SIGCOV of the subject: references mentioned here show that the article evidently passes WP:GNG. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 17:46, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.