Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Lei (Chinese cricketer) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Wang Lei (Chinese cricketer)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Following a clarification of WP:CRIN, it was decided cricketers who had played in World Cricket League Division Five or higher were notable. Lei has not played in the World Cricket League nor has he played first-class, List A or Twenty20 cricket, so per WP:CRIN and by extension WP:ATH he is non-notable. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  —AssociateAffiliate (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete (see above nomination) AssociateAffiliate (talk) 15:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Query why is this article being challenged again after it survived last time. Silent Billy (talk) 07:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Because WP:CRIC have clarified their notability guidelines, in line with WP:ATH so as to rule better on very minor "internationals" at such a low level of the sport.&mdash;User:MDCollins (talk) 11:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - player hasn't played in WCL5 or above (per nom) so doesn't meet WP:CRIN. He doesn't meet WP:ATH as, being an amateur, has not played at the highest level. No indication of any reliable sources to meet WP:GNG.&mdash;User:MDCollins (talk) 11:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - He doesn't seem to have played at a level that would confer notability. – PeeJay 13:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, there is some spotty third-party coverage here and here, but not really enough to build a verifiable article on him yet. Lankiveil (speak to me) 01:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.