Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang NewOne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 03:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Wang NewOne

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significant independent coverage (I've searched for both her English and Chinese names), fails WP:ARTIST. Zanhe (talk) 23:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete as failing WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC) Hello, I created the article Stub. Wang NewOne is an artist in numerous exhibits, and has been profiled in magazine (note Vice and Dazed Digital citations) and has received commissions, which helps with notability. I don't know Chinese but could use help filling out more information from someone who does. Yellow Swans (talk) 05:58, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. I could find no secondary, independent, reliable sources that meets WP:GNG; the sources cited on the article are of his Facebook page and YouTube channel, a source that appears to be dead (and even if it met Wikipedia's WP:RS guidelines, that source is definitely not sufficient to satisfy WP:GNG's requirement for significant coverage - enough in-depth coverage where an article can be written without the use of original research), and a few mentions from "NewHive" (a site that, by it's own words is a "multimedia publishing platform" that "provide[s] a blank space and custom tools to simplify the process of creating rich multimedia experiences on the web"). Also clearly fails WP:ARTIST.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   06:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello, original writer here. I just wanted to note that the source you say appears to be dead works for me and links to Vice Magazine online, China. You state that there are "mentions" by NewHive but I want to clarify that they also commission artwork and online exhibits, both of which are cited here. Yellow Swans (talk) 04:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Even if this source were to work and meet Wikipedia's reliable sources guidelines, it still does not satisfy Wikipedia's general notability guideline in that significant coverage must exist to the point that the article can be written without the use of original research. Unfortunately, this does not appear to be the case. Sorry :-(  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   04:59, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.