Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Shouxin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Kevin (talk) 22:07, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Wang Shouxin

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

I don't think a single corruption scandal makes this person notable. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 02:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are numerous hits from verified sources (books, academic sources, news) that show this woman to be notable. I'll work on the article if I have the time. --Mkativerata (talk) 03:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, The spoon-fed Google Books link above leads to hundreds of sources showing notability. Is it really too much to expect that an administrator, of all people, will take a few seconds to click on the automatically provided search results to avoid wasting everyone else's time with AfD discussions about articles with such obvious notability? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:44, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Google books search reveals a lot of coverage from several different books, fully satisfying notability through "significant coverage".   Malinaccier  ( talk ) 02:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.