Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wanjiku Kanjumba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 21:55, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Wanjiku Kanjumba

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BIO. Is WP:BLP1E - a would be astronaut. Article majors on her company rather than her. That fails WP:NCORP. Pretty much a puff piece. WP:ADMASQ 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Kenya. 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: Clear case of one event for graduating and working at NASA. Coverage on her company does not meet the notability guidelines for companies. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 20:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Nothing talk about her company. I can't see anything related her company on the references I checked. All the independent sources talked about with significant coverage. Please check it well 102.91.72.18 (talk) 16:17, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO without enough independent sources on his WP:BLP1E Ibjaja055 (talk) 09:06, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Im wondering why there's seems to be racist in this nomination. Nearly 90% of the references are secondary independent reliable source with a strong significant coverage. [],[] [], [], [], [] etc I'm wondering why you are saying so. Young astronomer like her with huge potential that she brings numerous development in astrology need to consider her notability. 102.91.72.18 (talk) 16:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep [], [], [] and [] are enough to establish notability. Again, young ladies are being encourage to include in Wikipedia. I feel sad when I found that ladies most especially scientists that bring a global development toward astrological science been marginalize by Wikipedia. 102.91.72.18 (talk) 16:22, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * With respect, she is neither an astronomer nor an astrologer. She is a wanna-be astronaut, and not a notable one. Your seeking to play the race card is deplorable, and your seeking to play the ageism/sexism card is no better. I should not have to remind you about WP:CIVIL.
 * In your note above you state that there is nothing about her company. There is, and it fails WP:NCORP. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay my apology of saying racism & Gender. But still more ladies are encourage to have Wikipedia. Please can you tell me what's astrology? She's astrology. One you have bachelor's degree in any rocket science or related you are considered to be called astrologist. 102.91.71.5 (talk) 16:45, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * No. You are not. 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I can't see nothing about her company! Even if there's it's just a mere mentioned. The sources gives a significant coverage than her company. This is not something to argue about it. 102.91.71.5 (talk) 16:48, 27 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Sources are about her compnay so via WP:INHERENT she isnt notable. Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.