Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wannabe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, and move disambig page to Wannabe. Sr13 01:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Wannabe

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Dicdef with little prospect of expansion. PC78 11:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. It's a well known term -- I'm not sure how it could easily be expanded, but I think the potential for expansion is there. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 16:25, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and Move Wannabe (disambiguation) to Wannabe. All potential expansion of the article is already covered in the disambiguation page and wiktionary. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 18:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and replace with disambig per DDG. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 23:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete> It's in Wictionary, which is all it really needs. Horologium talk - contrib 01:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep if sources could be found. At one level it is just an adjective -- "wannabe actor" -- but at another level, certainly in the 1980s, it represented something more about identity. Madonna's "wannabes" didn't just want to be pop singers, they wanted to be Madonna. I think there's a potential article here on that aspect of subculture. I know it was written about extensively at the time. --Dhartung | Talk 06:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm, search first. We have Madonna wannabe, which is in a sorry state, and doesn't cover the broader phenomenon, but I guess we don't need two articles. Delete. Preferably move Madonna wannabe here. --Dhartung | Talk 06:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and replace with disambig per DDG. - 52 Pickup 17:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, replace with disambig seems to be a dictionary entry. If many specific -wannabe articles start to pop up then maybe we'll need an article then. —Pengo 23:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * DeleteAs it is now the term seems vague and there is no info on its introduction and popularization. No real information presented here. User:Dimadick
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.