Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wannigan

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 20:46, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Wannigan
Delete Uh, whatever, no. And no, I will not suggest a redirect to Bluetooth. This might even be speediable under the second definition of Patent nonsense. -Splash 00:15, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * This might be BJAODN meterial. humblefool&reg; 00:21, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I speedied it once already. Delete.  -- Scott  ei&#960;  00:26, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete nonsense. plain and simple. Osu8907 00:46, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm trying to give up the deletionism - but it is just too hard this morning --Doc (?) 00:50, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Funnin' us. Delete. Denni &#9775; 01:02, 2005 July 24 (UTC)
 * Delete - What a load of rubbish. Definitely does not belong on Wikipedia. --Peter McGinley 02:56, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, but the word seems interesting. Some other definition of Wannigan might merit an article. Pburka 03:23, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. nonsense. --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  03:55, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Hamster Sandwich 05:10, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Patent nonsense KeithD 18:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * It's nonsense, but not Patent nonsense. The text makes sense; it's the topic which is nonsensical. Pburka 22:38, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Do bear in mind there are two definitions of patent nonsense over at Patent nonsense; there's an arguable case for this one under the second, perhaps. I decided not strong enough to tag it for speedy, but the second option of oft-overlooked. -Splash 22:43, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Haikupoet 23:42, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense. JamesBurns 06:40, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, although it did give me a laugh. --ScottyBoy900Q ∞ 15:07, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.