Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WarLight


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

WarLight

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD contested. Nomination as non-notable video game failing to pass WP:GNG with no multiple, reliable, independent, in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Of the sources I can locate:, but it is not in-depth; * - currently not vetted reliable, but looks good ("founded by a former Wall Street Journal culture reporter"). Other hits with non-trivial content do not appear reliable.

Existing source review: Of the 36 references, 28 are to the developer's own website, 5 are to a user-edited wikis, 3 are to store pages. None of these sources satisfy GNG, as they are not independent, reliable and in-depth. The content of the article focuses on gameplay and community, as sourced from developer's perspective, which violates writing about fiction. There is no real-world reception or development information, thus there doesn't appear to be any mergable content. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 13:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. —  HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 13:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak delete: Kill Screen is a reliable source and they wrote two articles about the game.. It has a page at Metacritic but there is no review. I doubt we can create any meaningful content based on the two sources. AdrianGamer (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * So it is, they changed their base domain name, so it didn't appear in the custom search. *I added the second hit to my nom. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 13:59, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as self-promotional, failing notability, and sources unavailable for improvement.  Scr ★ pIron IV 13:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as currently still questionable despite the mountains of listed links. SwisterTwister   talk  06:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.