Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War (Pop Smoke song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is a loose consensus that this article meets WP:NSONG. While there is some support for merging the article based on inadequate sourcing, arguments in favor of keeping the article suggest that coverage of the song and its music video (in addition to charting in Canada) is sufficient to establish notability. (non-admin closure) gobonobo  + c 14:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

War (Pop Smoke song)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not too many reliable resources. Article should be redirected after to Meet the Woo 2. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 03:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect to Meet the Woo 2 Apart from the music video (which receives a few passing-by articles) and the #100 peak on the Canadian charts, there is not enough information for a reasonably detailed article. A short paragraph mentioning this song at Meet the Woo 2 would be sufficient. HĐ (talk) 04:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong keep: 15 sources is a decent number and the song's charting may only be classified as indicating notability per WPN:Songs, but it also has a music video and I would have not passed or even reviewed for GA if I had my doubts. --K. Peake 06:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I doubt if a music video justifies notability.. HĐ (talk) 07:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * When there are numerous sources discussing the video, it does, especially if for a single. --K. Peake 07:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Judging from the content of the "Music video" section, not quite. Single quotations like sweet and simple don't add substance. The staff of SOHH commented that Pop Smoke and Lil Tjay "premiered their new 'War' music video to the masses".[15] Does this even have any meaning to it..? HĐ (talk) 08:11, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. HĐ (talk) 04:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. HĐ (talk) 04:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect to Meet the Woo 2 per HD. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kyle Peake. Enough reliably to warrant its own article. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 16:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I am confused... Why is nom voting keep on an article they nominated for deletion? HĐ (talk) 06:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If you look at the user's edit history, they were clearly going through a period of angst when adding multiple articles for AFD at once. --K. Peake 21:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 06:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: the music video received coverage, albeit limited. Heartfox (talk) 18:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep the song has received decent coverage for its composition plus a music video was released as well as it charting. --K. Peake 06:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You already wrote "strong keep" and these same arguments above?? Heartfox (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Discussion was relisted. --K. Peake 21:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Striking as you can't vote multiple times in an AfD. Relisting is to help determine clearer consensus. Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Kyle Peake's previous comment. AshMusique (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.