Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War Wagon (comics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Hulk (comics). Unsourced article history deleted. Cirt (talk) 02:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

War Wagon (comics)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This element of fiction does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article about a comic book weapon that does not have independent reliable sources. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 23:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge I'd try to get  the information merged somewhere in the description of the game play. Calling the contents plot summary, though,  seems to be expanding the meaning significantly.  DGG (talk) 06:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Was this !vote intended for a different article? The subject here is not a game. ~ Ningauble (talk) 18:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge find a source and add to the article about the Korean weapon (in one of those "in popular culture" sections that seem so popular. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - trivial coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 19:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Hulk (comics) (or at least turn it into a redirect there) as merging it into the popular culture section of Hwacha is (as it stands) based on speculation and those sections attract enough of it anyway so I don't think we should be adding to it. If someone can come up with sources and can create a viable article in their sandbox then we could look at allowing this article to spring back to life put until then just switch it into a redirect. (Emperor (talk) 21:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC))
 * Delete or Merge. WP:PLOT and WP:GNG apply here, as clarified in WP:WAF and WP:WAF, respectively. ~ Ningauble (talk) 18:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  treelo  radda  00:06, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.