Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War against Iran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was unanimous snowballed delete. Acalamari 17:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

War against Iran

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Gaze into the crystal ball... This is a one sentence article that just serves to link to Opposition to war against Iran and Support for war against Iran. There is no reason to have this page. GhostPirate 03:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agreed. Nice idea maybe, but too vague to actually be an article. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry 03:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and POV. "The country is divided on the issue" - which country? There are 192 member states of the United Nations. Dbromage  [Talk]  03:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per deletion of Rush Hour 4 and The Grudge: Undone. No, I'm kidding. The real reason the article should be deleted is because the article contains virtually no information, as there is no actual war against Iran. The article is almost a disambiguation page, s it links to two articles which discuss the political concept of a war against Iran. Still, even as a disambiguation page, it's unnecessary. Calgary 03:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ford MF 05:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:CRYSTAL our dear President doesn't have enought time to create a third war, I hope... -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  05:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, too short and vague article. Information is already covered in the articles it links to. J I P  | Talk 06:15, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as crystal ball gazing and unnecessary disambiguation. Thin Arthur 08:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Given the fact that the US lacks the military wherewithal to prosecute such a war, there's no reason to assume we can secure a successful Wikipedia article about it either.  One of those is harder than the other, though I'm not sure which. Qworty 10:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. VanTucky  (talk) 16:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.