Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War crimes by unconventional weapons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  05:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

War crimes by unconventional weapons

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

a WP:BIASed selection of purported war crimes conducted largely by the West. The "war crimes" were either not War crimes at the relevant time or were conducted by countries that were not signatories to the relevant international convention(s). This selective retrospective application is non-encyclopaedic and does not belong here. We already have a detailed page on War crimes and specific pages for various events and countries, where all relevant events should be listed. Mztourist (talk) 04:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Mztourist (talk) 04:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

2- I agree that events have a specific page and specific pages and I tried to list all of these on one page. We can change the name of the article to The list of uses of unconventional weapons.M1nhm (talk) 11:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:POVFORK. Quite an effort really, not one actual war crime in the whole article. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  07:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like list of military operations I dislike. There seems to be no evidence that the vast majority of incidents were actually war crimes. Googleguy007 (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as both POVFORK and BIAS. Intothatdarkness 17:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per pretty much all of the above. There is really no way I can see to salvage anything here. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 21:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * keep 1- According to Guide to deletion: “A failure to conform to a neutral point of view is usually remedied through editing for neutrality” So, with respect, if there is a POV, it is not a reason to delete the article.
 * Its not just your POV, its the fact that these events are/were not war crimes. Mztourist (talk) 03:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * These events have happened in history and This list tries to collect them. even if this not be war crime, we can change the name of the article to fix the problem, I did not understand why the article should be deleted. M1nhm (talk) 07:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Just WP:SYNTH/WP:OR. Jacona (talk) 17:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.