Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warcraft III:Chapter 1 (Rise of the Naga)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete - although is there a Warcraft-themed Wiki somewhere that could take these? DS 14:34, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Warcraft III:Chapter 1 (Rise of the Naga)


These articles are plot summaries for chapters in the computer game Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne. I'm listing them for deletion because I feel this level of detail oversteps the WP:NOT and WP:CVG guidelines regarding indiscriminate and crufty content. An overview of the plot in the main Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne article is sufficient to cover this material. --Muchness 03:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Articles for individual levels in a game? Talk about cruft. TJ Spyke 04:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete All per nom -- Whpq 04:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fancruft --Wildnox(talk) 04:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. I would have no problem with smerging a bit of this to the main article, but most of it is worthless. --- RockMFR 04:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination -- Bec-Thorn-Berry 06:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Subtrivial fancruft. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom, clear cruft and not really necessary. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 07:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Wow, fancruft supreme! SkierRMH 08:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per above. Warcruft. MER-C 10:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Belongs on a fansite, not a WP article. Bastun 14:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete All- Per above-- SU IT  18:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete All per above ~ EdBoy[c] 19:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all as too much gamecruft.-- danntm T C 20:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nominator. I'd laugh if anyone voted keep. Greeves 21:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all: Gamecruft, but credit to the person who has been trying to create every single chapter. Hard work elsewhere, please.   x42bn6  Talk 02:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * delete all per norm and above. --BenWhitey 03:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 21:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep all: Remove the quest info and leave the story info. I'd suggest merging it into either the main article or a separate article detailing the chapters. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CyberSkull (talk • contribs) 03:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC).
 * Delete all per nom; individual chapters in game are non-notable. --Scottie theNerd 13:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.