Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ward Morehouse (activist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, notability sufficiently established by book and news sources. lifebaka++ 17:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Ward Morehouse (activist)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable. Don't confuse internet research with Ward Morehouse Kingturtle (talk) 07:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I have added an old Christian Science Monitor reference to the article; it's an approximately 1000-world profile of him for his work on Bhopal. I regard his notability as marginal; we certainly have less notable people with articles, but I don't believe in the lowest common denominator. Thus, I have no opinion on this AfD. RayAYang (talk) 00:52, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Angus McLellan  (Talk) 14:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete notability not established. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 0:42, July 25, 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm pretty sure he can pass WP:NOTE, but it'll take a little work to turn up the sources (and it sure doesn't help having that other Ward Morehouse!). Cgingold (talk) 09:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  JForget  22:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. I happened to have Kim Fortuin's Advocacy after Bhopal on the shelf, and he gets non-trivial coverage in this book, which is good enough for me. Mostlyharmless (talk) 12:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of reliable coverage in reliable sources here and here. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.