Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warehouse Republic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 15:28, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Warehouse Republic
My name is Andrei Nedelea, the manager of Warehouse Republic, and I would like this page and anything else referencing the band removed. This has no relation to Warehouse Republic and a fair amount of what is written here is both libellous and defamatory towards the band. Both the band and myself have no connection to anything that has been written and dont think that having this page is constructive towards anything resembling public interest and will also submit an offical request to have it removed.
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

This article about a band seems to assert enough to get past speedy. But it is totally unsourced and so transparently written to play up their image I knew I'd have to look into it. I cannot find the "multiple [independent] non-trivial published works," nor anything else about this group, that would satisfy WP:BAND. And if anyone's talking about Charlie Flynn and Frances Bean Cobain, they're not doing it on teh newfangled internets. Glenfarclas (talk) 12:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 12:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, though I'm willing to change this if anyone can point me to supporting reliable source coverage. I did look around for such coverage when adding the issue tags as part of new page patrol, and found none (and only (False positive hits in GNews)) though the article itself appears to assert that such coverage exists. Inclined to regard this assertion as not credible, since e.g. the NME website has no mention of the band despite their purported "Beatles with beats" quote. Gonzonoir (talk) 13:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 19:29, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - NME doesn't seem to know they exist nor does anyone else, and I can't find a Panda Records that would meet our guidelines for notability either, so there's nothing here that really comes up to WP:BAND. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

I dont think that this article should be deleted. Whilst I too haven't heard about the Frances Bean/Charlie Flynn thing I have heard of the band. They have supported some big names and also have a record coming out next year. I heard them on a late night Radio 1 show and think that they should have an article on here. Instead of deleting the entire article why not just delete the Cobain/Flynn thing instead? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.85.12.211 (talk) Not particularly as I use a public library. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.85.12.211 (talk) 12:29, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Reply: Good to know that you've never "heard about the Frances Bean/Charlie Flynn thing," but that makes it especially odd that you originated it on Frances Bean Cobain's page six weeks ago (see here), don't you think? --Glenfarclas (talk) 13:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

My name is Andrei Nedelea, the manager of Warehouse Republic, and I would like this page and anything else referencing the band removed. This has no relation to Warehouse Republic and a fair amount of what is written here is both libellous and defamatory towards the band. Both the band and myself have no connection to anything that has been written and dont think that having this page is constructive towards anything resembling public interest and will also submit an offical request to have it removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.231.203 (talk) 22:12, 28 December 2009 (UTC)