Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warfare Noise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Clearly not enough participation to decide on this despite multiple relists (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:18, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Warfare Noise

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NALBUM. DePRODded and two additional sources added, but I still don't see how this passes WP:NALBUM. The original (only) source was a link to an empty AllMusic entry, the two sources added are a review from Metal Injection, which isn't generally considered an RS, and a link to the record label's Bandcamp site hosting the album, which isn't independent or demonstrating any notability. There's a promotional press release on Brave Words (no author byline, so probably uploaded by the record company itself, and therefore not independent or notable), two passing mentions in books (in Portuguese) which literally say nothing more than "it was released", , and slightly more in an Italian book  but unfortunately this appears to be self-published so may have to be discounted as a source. So even if the Metal Injection review is considered reliable, this is still the only in-depth source in the article. As all four bands on this split album went on to be notable, there isn't an obvious redirect target, per WP:XY. Richard3120 (talk) 19:33, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of independent reliable secondary sources. Bolhones (talk) 20:57, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep While the sourcing isn't best, the subject is still seemingly notable enough for having own page. Wareon (talk) 02:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Could you please show how it is notable according to WP:NALBUM? Richard3120 (talk) 16:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: I found a few reliable sources which talk about the album:, , and . With these sources, the album is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. My vote stands. I won't reply any further.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 08:00, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Only Ultimate Guitar is a reliable source, and in none of those sources is there anything more than a one line passing mention. Richard3120 (talk) 16:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 06:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I have overturned the previous "keep" closure of this discussion. See Special:Permalink/964632624. Best, Kevin ( aka L235 · t · c) 17:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp  💬  18:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.