Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wario Land (Virtual Boy)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. CDC  (talk)  22:26, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

Wario Land (Virtual Boy)
non-notable game from what the article itself says was an unsuccessful game system. DES 00:01, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although the system may have been unsuccesful, it is notable. As for the game itself, Wario is a notable Nintendo character, and this game could be considered part of the series. It does appear to need some cleanup, however. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 00:12, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nintendocruft. JamesBurns 05:02, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * 'Cruft' is not a deletion criteria. Sonic Mew | talk to me 11:40, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't see a good reason for deleting this article. --Cloveious 05:27, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - The game system was not successful, but it was a notable (well-known) failure, including titles like this one. --Mysidia 05:30, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep The article certainly needs some work, but as Wario is a highly notable character, I see no reason to delete it. Sonic Mew | talk to me 11:40, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Partly notable due to its lack of success.  -- Norvy (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Being a VB game puts it in a pretty freaking select crowd.  Almafeta 01:08, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Would you propose to delete the article about the Ford Edsel on the grounds that it was unsuccessful? The commercial failure of both products makes them more notable, not less. --Pagrashtak 23:32, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.