Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wario the Quario (2 nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete as reposted content. Yank sox  07:24, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Wario the Quario
Supposedly an internet meme, "popular" and "circulated on myspace". Generates 3 unique GHits, 11 total outside Wikipedia. I generate more hits than that. Fan-1967 03:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. When I first saw this, I saw some value in it; so I think it is notable. --24.208.241.169 04:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I guess we should keep this since "Wario the Quario" almost gets 300 Yahoo hits. --Clarenceville Trojan | contact 04:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: Above user is the article's author. -- H·G (words/works) 04:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 *  Delete  of course. Only 3 unique Ghits? Only 311 views on YouTube, including my visit to see how many views there were? Certainly notability is far from established. -- H·G (words/works) 04:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * SPEEDY Delete, all of my above reasons still stand, but this has also been deleted three times (see Articles for deletion/Wario the Quario and Articles for deletion/Wario the Quario (2nd nomination)). One of the deletions was apparently a speedy, making this the 3rd AfD on this topic. Consensus each of those times was that it failed notability, and I see nothing here to show that this has changed. -- H·G (words/works) 04:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per HumbleGod. Danny Lilithborne 06:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy del per HumbleGod. - A Link to the Past (talk) 06:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as recreation of deleted material. It's still not a notable meme. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 07:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.