Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warner Avenue


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 04:34, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Warner Avenue

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability issues, we don't usually have articles for minor roads. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 16:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 16:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Notability is not about whether something is minor. We have plenty of articles on minor things.  Notability is about how well documented knowledge of a thing is, and this road as far as I can tell simply isn't well documented.  I can find information about a bridge, discussed in the context of the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, and a related person, a local politician from the mid 20th century, but pretty much nothing about this road. Uncle G (talk) 18:22, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
 * let me get this straight, your argument is that my argument is weak because it didn't agree with a section in an essay that you wrote (as evidenced by this edit). Just because you wrote an essay on notability and you appear to be an expert in this subject, it doesn't mean you're right? Maybe a link to something someone else wrote about notability would help? The second part of that answer is fine, I can agree with you, but the first two sentences are fundamentally flawed. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 19:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment - regardless of whether it's his own essay or not, he's right - notability in Wikipedia is determined on coverage and reliable sources, not on whether it is "minor". For example, an article on a 300m street in Sydney, Australia has plenty of coverage. Bookscale (talk) 11:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete—fails WP:GNG.  Imzadi 1979  →   23:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Entirely unremarkable and has no real sources that can assert notability.  Sounder Bruce  23:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks sources and any sign of notability.Nikoo.Amini (talk) 01:07, 17 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.