Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren, East Sussex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion based on failure to meet WP:V. TerriersFan (talk) 23:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Warren, East Sussex
Warren does not appear to be a place in Eastbourne, as a local I am sure I would have heard of it. It certainly lacks nobility. The article is just one line, created by a single user. Putney Bridge (talk) 18:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. There isn't a "Warren" in Eastbourne.  There's a tiny hamlet called "Wren's Warren" near Crowborough (which is near Tunbridge Wells, some way from Eastbourne), and there are a few doubtful-looking references to a "Warren, Sussex" from whence one of Thomas Jefferson's ancestors apparently came in the thirteenth century, but nothing else. Tevildo (talk) 18:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - even if it exists, it would fail WP:LOCAL. JohnCD (talk) 20:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. The Ordnance Survey site at http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/ does not have a listing for Warren, East Sussex. I did, however, find a listing there for Crowborough Warren in East Sussex at grid reference TQ 505 305 . There is a Wikipedia article for Crowborough, but not for Crowborough Warren. --Eastmain (talk) 21:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Excellent detective work - Wren's Warren is at TQ 472 324, incidentally. :) Tevildo (talk) 22:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * delete - as non-existant, based upon evidence given above. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  04:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Great detective work. If our arbitrary practice is to keep article for even the smallest hamlets, we still have the verifiability requirement. They must actually exist or once have existed, at a definite place. Edison (talk) 15:19, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.