Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Faidley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per absence of delete preferences and successful application of the Heymann Standard. (non-admin closure) Skomorokh  00:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Warren Faidley

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Disclaimer: bio articles aren't my area of expertise so this AfD might be in error. From what the article says he might very well be notable but none of the claims are backed up by any sources. Sections of the article read like pure advertisements and I have serious doubts on some of the claims made (his "best selling" book isn't even carried by Amazon any more). With the removal of all dubious and uncited claims it would leave the article as a stub and lacking a claim to notability. With that said I do see some potential for a complete rewrite to pass WP:V and WP:N. BJ Talk 14:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep: providing the author provides more reliable sources. Dwilso  21:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The author doesn't seem very active, I'm not holding my breath. BJ Talk 22:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are plenty of sources available from Google News and Google Books, including a 48 page book about him published by Penguin. I've put some references into the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.